User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/Timothytyy

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.

General notability guidelines

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: Because new editors may not know the guidelines. Biting them may discourage them to continue to edit Wikipedia, so instead we should inform them about the guidelines.

Y Assuming good faith is important as most new editor edit Wikipedia with an aim to improve the articles. New editors often lack of Wikipedia guidelines knowledge and resulting in what is not appropriate/violate the guidlines. What we could do is to behave in a civilized manner, not give rise to or support fights and educate the new editors and explain and provide the guidelines links to them to avoid attacks (bite) on new editors which may result in unpleasant situations such as fights or their leave and subsequent loss to the project. Discussion of a wide dispute on content can be resolve in consensus argreement in the article talk pages. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

2. In your own words, how is notability defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: How suitable is it for that topic to have an article in Wikipedia.

N pls read the WP:N again and answer again.

Answer again: Notability is whether a certain topic guarantees its own article.

Timothytyy You need to read the "WHOLE" page and sometimes also the "See also" sections of each links/guidelines provided. Pls read WP:N again and re-answer the questions the 3rd time.

Answer again: Notability means how worthy the subject is. It is supposed to be notable for an article if it has received sufficient coverage in dependable sources that are independent from the subject and the article does not belong to WP:NOT.

Y In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia talk 05:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: No per WP:NOTHOWTO. An instruction manual is not considered notable.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: GNG is applicable for articles belonging to every kind of topic (i.e. more general), but SNG is only applicable for articles belonging to a certain subject to help clarify if an article should be created. I believe we should use primarily use GNG to patrol an article; if it doesn't pass GNG, then check if it passes SNG. An article can be considered as notable by using either GNG or SNG.

@Cassiopeia Sorry for disturbing but can you mark this question first? Because I want to know if GNG or SNG is used in article notability. I recently noticed the rapid draftification of articles from User:Onel5969 with a reason of GNG (e.g. 1) even when the article meets SNG. Timothytyy (talk) 03:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy you need to re-answer question 2 first and truely understand what define GNG prior I would answer you you questions and review Q-4 answer. (in future, all communication state in the communication section of the specific assignment). Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Both can be used when patrolling but those subject falls under SNG/SSG (sport specific guidelines). However, SNG does NOT superseded GNG. And if SNG/SSG fails to meet the WP:GNG guidelines would sometimes nominated for deletion, WP:AfD for discussion, to determine the status of the article. (We will cover AfD in later assignment). (Note: in regardless how long the article has been existed in Wikipedia mainspace, if the article does not meet GNG, it could always be nominated for deletion WP:AfD after the nominated editor has done a WP:BEFORE. Cassiopeia talk 05:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Specific notability guidelines

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: Yes, the subject is not considered as notable because according to WP:DEPTH, an event must receive significant or in-depth coverage to be notable.

Y.Lack of significant coverage of independent, reliable sources (IRS). Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

6. A New York city based 2021 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: Depends on the amount of significant coverage. According to WP:NCORP, a company is considered as notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

{u|Timothyty}}{u|So since it is not source provided, what would be your answer?

Cassiopeia No. Fails NCORP. Timothytyy (talk) 14:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

7. Guram Kutateladze who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 12-2.

Answer: Not notable per WP:NMMA. Not ranked in the top 10.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2022 and to be released on August 2023 in the cinemas.

Answer: Likely not (unless there is significant coverage). According to WP:NFF, films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles. (I don't know if the "report" you mentioned was significant or not)

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2021 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: Likely not (I'm not sure if local newspapers coverage makes it pass GNG), as according to WP:POLITICIAN, an unelected candidate for political office does not guarantee notability (also he/she did/does not hold any political positions).

Y. Most political candidates would have some campaign coverage; however, that can NOT contribute to the GNG or POLITICIAN notability guidelines especially the coverage is local. A politician candidate can be notable if the are pass GNG on other than what they have coverage by the campaigned. Once the political candidate is elected even thought they have yet to resume office, they are considered "notable" and would subject to merit a page in Wikipedia as long as they pass GNG. Cassiopeia talk

10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2020 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer: No, as according to WP:MUSICBIO, releasing an album on a WP:BADCHART does not guarantee notability.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer: WP:NACADEMIC #1 and 8: Research has a great impact on neuroeconomics, decision theory and game theory. Chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology.

(a) WP:NPROF Subject meets WP:NPROF #1 - see [1] for being highly cited.

(b). Criteria 1 states that: The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. Hence, Carlos has worked extensively in in game theory, bounded rationality, social choice, and  behavioral economics

(c). Criteria 2 stated that: The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. Hence, the subject has met this criteria in that he is a speaker of the interdisciplinary research unit "Psychoeconomics," funded by the German Research Foundation (GRF)

(d). Criteria 4: The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. Carlos har authored and co-authored important books and worked on many significant topics, game theory, behavioural economics etc.

(e) Criteria 8: The person has been head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area. Thus, Carlos is the editor in chief of the Journal of Economic Psychology.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: WP:NMMA #1. Formerly ranked in #2 in fightmatrix.com.

Y pass WP:NMMA #1 and meet [Wikipedia:NKICK]] "Have been ranked in the world top-10 by a major, preferably two, independent publication that meets the definition of a reliable source". Thus Overeem have being ranked 4th in the world in the heavyweight division of Glory and was the first fighter to hold world titles in MMA and K-1 kickboxing at the same time. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: WP:SINGER #1: Lots of independent and reliable sources; #8: Nominated for the Grammy Award 2 times

Y. Notable under SINGER#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #11, #12 and NACTOR#1, #2, #3. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: WP:DEPTH: More than enough significant or in-depth coverage. Also WP:EFFECT per sources 52 and 53 in the article.

Y. Cassiopeia talk

15. Persepolis

Answer: WP:GEOLAND: Notable per WP:NTEMP; highly populated a long time ago, and the city is historically significant.

Y. Cassiopeia talk

---

Timothytyy, Good day. See assignment 1 above.

(1) For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs (see Help:Diff for instructions) of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, talk page messages that are applicable.

(2) Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis.

(3) Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment).

(4) Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review.

(5) If you need to take a break from editing Wikipedia for more than 2 weeks, pls inform me so I may know. If you Stay safe and best. Welcome to NPPS. Cassiopeia talk 03:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy,

(1) Please re-answer the Q2 so I will review and answer Q4 answer.

(2) Pls check if subject (especial biography) pass more than one SNG.

(3) When you have done with (2), ping me. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy You need to read the "WHOLE" page and sometimes also the "See also" sections of each links/guidelines provided. Pls read WP:N again and re-answer the questions the 3rd time. And when you have done, pls let me know on here (the communication section). Cassiopeia talk 01:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Pinging in case you missed my former ping. Timothytyy (talk) 08:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

{{u|Timothytyy} Sorry for the delay, friend from oversea is in town, a little bit busy but I will look into the assignment - Give me a day or two. Thank you for your understanding. Cassiopeia talk 02:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Sorry for disturbing you again, but if you have a little time, can you please look into Q.2 and Q.4? Also can you start preparing for assignment 2? Thanks a lot! Timothytyy (talk) 13:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy See comments on Q2 and Q4. So sorry for the delay as I was playing host for my friend who is in town for the last few weeks and all my work in Wikipedia has been piled up. I will post the next assignment for you shortly. Cassiopeia talk 05:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

---

Sources

Background for trainees

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.

You could contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on web due to Paywall content or printed books.

---

Exercises

1.

Topic	Explanation	5 Examples	Comment by Cass
Reliable source	Independently published sources with a reputation for accuracy which publishes provable facts instead of personal opinions.	(example)The Guardian newspaper Books by recognized experts The Washington Post The New York Times SCMP BBC	Y. Cassiopeia talk 04:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
User generated sources	Content by individual users with limited editorial oversight.	Facebook Fandom Instagram Twitter Wikipedia (self referencing)	Y. Cassiopeia talk 04:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Non Independent source	A source in which the publisher of it is closely related to the article's subject.	Press releases Official websites Social media Autobiographies Interviews	Y. Cassiopeia talk 04:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

2.

Type	Explanation	Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary)	Comment by Cass
Primary	Written by someone who was close to an event and often directly involved.	(example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results Poems Songs Novels Political reports Raw data Artifacts Interviews Speeches Manuscripts Diaries The Holy Bible The Quran Statistics A film Autobiographies A painting	Y. Cassiopeia talk 04:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Secondary	Sources that analyze, evaluate or interpret primary sources.	(example) newspaper Data analysis Book/film reviews Eyewitness reports First-hand accounts of events in World War I Explanation of difficult mathematical ideas and proofs	Y. Eyewitness reports and first-hand accounts are considered primary sources as the subject (source) is original materials that are close to an event. Secondary source provides thought and reflection based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. Also "explanation of" is not the same as "analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of" as explanation imply make understood to those who do not comprehend the material but subject (source) does not provide further thought or reflection of the original material. Cassiopeia talk 04:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tertiary	Sources which collect information from secondary sources to provide an overview of the sources; however, they do not provide additional analysis.	(example) encyclopedias Wikipedia Databases School textbooks Dictionaries Travel guides	Y. Travel guides - it depends the travel guides (source) info is provided by the travelers themselves (primary source) or the info is gather from many secondary and primary source (tertiary source). Cassiopeia talk 04:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

3.

Subject	Primary	Secondary	Tertiary	Comment by Cass
Example: Art	Example:Sculpture	Example:Article critiquing the sculpture	Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History	The Statue of Liberty	Analysis on the significance of the Statue of Liberty	History textbook	Y
Science	Scientific data from researches	Explanation from another scientist about how this research can change the world	Scientific database	Y Again not "explanation" but "analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis". Cassiopeia talk 04:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Athletes	Athlete statistics	An article recalling the athlete's fantastic career	Wikipedia article	Y. Cassiopeia talk 04:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer: Inaccurate information may be added to Wikipedia without verification, and the accuracy of articles would be impacted. Therefore RS is essential for keeping up the neutrality and accuracy of Wikipedia articles.

N. Reliable sources (RS) do not mean accuracy of the information but no doubt in most cases info from RS is accurate. This is because no RS is 100% accuracy (human, typo mistakes, analysis, and etc.) but also it depends from which info the RS based the material of. Content needs to verifiable so we may know where the info/source from for we could know if the source is independent and/or reliable, and not because it is the facts or true - see WP:But it's true!. If source indicated XXX is from Jamaica but the fact XXX is from Cuba, we put XXX is from Jamaica in article as per source. We will correct the info when the sources (not need to be the same source) correct itself. For example Alexander the Great - How he die is based on which sources you read, from poising, to malaria and typhoid fever to infectious (meningitis) to acute pancreatitis and etc. Cassiopeia talk 05:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer: No in any case, as Wikipedia is a user-generated source, so using Wikipedia as a source would be self-referencing and therefore does not guarantee verifiability.

Y. Wikipedia can not be the sources as the content of Wikipedia is supported by "other sources" - See WP:CIRCULAR. Wikipedia is a online knowledge sharing platform. Readers should check the sources in the article and verify/read the info themselves. Cassiopeia talk 05:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer: An article published by the New York Times about the centenary anniversary of the newspaper, as although the source is reliable, the article is published by the website itself, so it is not neutral.

Y. Same as an autobiography of Benjamin Franklin in an article about him published by Oxford University Press is reliable (as the press is reputable) but the author writes about himself), thus it is not independent as the autobiography is a primary source, where the author describes first hand his life and work. Cassiopeia talk 05:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer: Wikipedia itself per WP:CIRCULAR. It is independent from the subject but is not reliable as it is user-generated.

Y. Another example is that The UK Sun newspaper is has a poor record of fact-checking and accuracy. It is therefore not a reliable source but would considered intendent of the subject which the source reported. Cassiopeia talk 05:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

Example Article about Bill Gates

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/williamhgates/	Linkedin is considered not independent as the info is provided by the subject.	Since the content is self-published, thus it is considered not a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy source	The source provide significant info about the subject	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Source assessment

8.

David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012 after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008), a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.

In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/	Not affiliated with the subject	A reputable published source	Discusses the subject in detail	✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch	Not affiliated with the subject	Reliable per RSP	Provides coverage for an event about him	✔ Yes
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893	Not affiliated with the subject	Not reliable as it contains a lot of individual's opinions.	Discusses the subject in detail	✘ No
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012	Not affiliated with the subject	Anyone can edit it, no signs of fact-checking	Not about the subject himself	✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005	Not affiliated with the subject	Reliable per RSP	Provides detailed coverage about the subject	✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html	Interview of the subject	Since it is an interview, all content are the subject's opinions	Discusses the subject in detail	✘ No
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html	Not affiliated with the subject	Reliable per RSP	Discusses the subject in detail	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Huffpost - Although HuffPost contributors is considered not reliable in WP:RSP but if we look closely, the piece is written by By ANNE FLAHERTY, KIMBERLY DOZIER AND ADAM GOLDMAN, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. The Associated press is considered reliable source as they sell their news to other news agencies. However, the content is based on many individual opinions, for such I would talk it as not reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 08:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: I am not sure about this. The best answer would be WP:NPOL #1 and #2 as his post is significant and there is SIGCOV, but I notice a deprecated WP:SOLDIER which may be more suitable.

N. Subject was previously pass WP:SOLDIER SNG but since after the discussion the WP:SOLDIER SNG no longer applied. Subject does not meet WP:NPOL as subject does not have any political position. Subject passes WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Cassiopeia talk 08:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

10.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player. She won five Grand Slam singles titles. Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000. She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships, which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/	Written by the subject	User-generated	The gallery does not actually provide coverage for the subject	✘ No
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html	Not affiliated with the subject	Per RSP	Subject discussed in detail	✔ Yes
	Not affiliated with the subject	Fein is reputable for his articles	No coverage provided for the subject	✘ No
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis	Not affiliated with the subject	ESPN, a major website, is considered reliable	Subject discussed in detail	✔ Yes
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis	Not affiliated with the subject	Per RSP	Subject discussed in detail	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Btw Her Instagram source do provide significant coverage (in term of images) of herself. Cassiopeia talk 08:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: WP:NTENNIS #1 (per article), #2 (per sources) and #4 (per article).

Y. Good. Subject pass WP:NTENNIS SSN (sport specific notability) - Full content from the article Martina Hingis would pass all the WP:NTENNIS criteria.

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" or "?" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

12.

Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan. Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture." This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/	Not affiliated with the subject	Per RSP	Discusses the subject in detail	✘ No
https://franklloydwright.org/work/	Affiliated with the subject	Factual reliability can be questioned due to being not independent	Discusses the subject in detail	✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm	Not affiliated with the subject	Per RSP	Discusses the subject in detail	✔ Yes
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC	Author not affiliated with the subject	Author seems notable	Discusses the subject in detail	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: WP:CREATIVE #2 and 4. #2: Originator of "Organic architecture"; #4: Fallingwater had been called as "the best all-time work of American architecture".

Y. Full content from the article of Frank Lloyd Wright, he would pass all the all (1-4) WP:ARCHITECT criteria. Cassiopeia talk 08:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

14.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA. He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor. In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy. Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/	User-generated	Per RSP	Subject discussed in detail	✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales	Subject is a member of BAFTA	Closely affiliated with the subject	No coverage for the subject	✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125	User generated	Per RSP	? Dead link	✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/	? It is not about the subject himself	Seems like a primary source to me	Not about the subject	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:DIRECTOR. Cannot see any indications of significance of the subject.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 08:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

16.

Sonny Bill Williams 2010

Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim, is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer, Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland. In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html	Not affiliated with the subject	Deprecated per RSP	Subject discussed in detail	✘ No
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108	Publisher is his team	? Famous team but may not be reliable as it is not independent from the subject.	Subject discussed in detail	✘ No
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308	Not affiliated with the subject	Major newspaper	Trivial mention	✘ No
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html	Not affiliated with the subject	Major newspaper	Subject was somewhat discussed in-depth	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

17. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Passes WP:SPORTBASIC but I don't see any SNGs for rugby players.

Y. Many team sport SGN were removed after a discussion last year and prior to that subject passed WP:RLN criteria 1, 3, and and in full article subject passed WP:NRU. criteria 1, 2 which the links now both are redirected to WP:NSPORT. At the current state (Sonny Bill Williams (full content)), subject passes WP:SPORTBASIC. Cassiopeia talk 09:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

18.

Bryan Adams Guadalajara 2006

"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year"

Weekly charts

Chart (1991-1992)	Peak position
US Mainstream Rock (Billboard)	2
Denmark (IFPI)	2
US Billboard Hot 100	2

End-of-year charts

End-of-year chart (1991)	Position
Canada Top Singles (RPM)	3

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/09/arts/grammy-short-list-many-for-a-few.html	Major newspaper	Major newspaper	? Not accessible	? Unknown
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/RTT	? Not accessible	Billboard is considered as reliable	? Not accessible	? Unknown
https://www.billboard.com/music/Bryan-Adams/chart-history/HSI	? Not accessible	Billboard is considered as reliable	? Not accessible	? Unknown
https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/image.aspx?Image=nlc008388.2024&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fwww.collectionscanada.gc.ca%2fobj%2f028020%2ff4%2fnlc008388.2024.gif&Ecopy=nlc008388.2024	Not affiliated with the subject	A state-owned website	No coverage about the song	✘ No
https://www.musicvf.com/song.php?title=Can%27t+Stop+This+Thing+We+Started+by+Bryan+Adams&id=7272	Not affiliated with the subject	A reputable website with a chart list	No significant coverage about the song; is primary	✘ No
https://musicchartsarchive.com/singles/bryan-adams/cant-stop-this-thing-we-started	Not affiliated with the subject	A reputable website with a chart list	No significant coverage about the song; is primary	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. Cassiopeia talk

19. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: WP:NSONG #1. Ranked on three significant charts.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 09:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

20.

Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_	Produced by subject	RSP	Subject discussed in detail	✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/	Produced by subject	RSP	Subject discussed in detail	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

Y. source ( https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_) produces by subject but on that link has nothing mention about him. Cassiopeia talk 09:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

21. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Fails WP:ARCHITECT.

N. Solution Architect is not budling architect. Solution Architect is who works in an IT (Information Technology) company whose responsibilities include designing, and managing solution to match the specific business problems by integrating software and hardware to fit the existing information technology environment. Cassiopeia talk 09:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

---

Timothytyy See assignment 2 above. Cassiopeia talk 05:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Just to let you know that I am going on a vacation. I hate Wikibreaks, but if my IP block exempt doesn't work properly, I may disappear for 8 days. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. Timothytyy (talk) 14:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy No worries and thank you for letting me know. Happy holiday! Cassiopeia talk 21:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy I was out of town for the week and will review the assignment at soonest. Pls ping me at the "communication section" and not on the summary edit. Be save and best. Cassiopeia talk

Cassiopeia Sorry for bothering, just asking when will you mark my assignment? Thank you! Timothytyy (talk) 07:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy Sorry it takes some time to review the assignment. Pls see comments above especially on secondary sources section. Pls let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on. Be safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 09:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia I am ready to move on, just want to know if the correct answer of 21 is NCORP? Thanks! Timothytyy (talk) 10:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy This is WP:NCORP. Once you have read it and pls let me know if Q21 is NCORP. Cassiopeia talk 11:35, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Is the correct answer "fails BASIC and ANYBIO"? Timothytyy (talk) 02:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy You didnt answer if Q21 falls under NCORP as requested. NCORP is about company or organizations. Under Wikipedia:Notability (people), which includes academics, sport persons, politician/judges, creative persons, crimes or entertainers as he is a Engineers so it should under WP:ANYBIO and subject fails to meet the ANYBIO notability guidelines due to no significant coverage by independent, reliable sources that cover him in dept and in lenght for verification.06:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

---

Content Policy

Article titles

Please read WP:TITLE and answer the questions below

1. Article name "Hannibal Barca" - Does the article name need to be change? and Why? (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC).

References

Answer: The title should be changed to "Hannibal" per COMMONNAME as all sources seem to refer to the subject as "Hannibal" but not "Hannibal Barca". Disambiguation may or may not be needed as there are other subjects that share the name "Hannibal", but the general is still the primary topic. A redirect like "Hannibal (general)" might be needed.

Y. Good. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

---

2. Article name "Magic Johnson". Does the article name need to be change? and Why?(please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons.

References

Answer: No change in the article name is needed because all sources refer to the subject as "Magic Johnson" instead of "Earvin Johnson" or other names.

Y. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

---

Biographies of living persons

Please read WP:BLP and answer the questions below.

3. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion.

On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin. The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation. McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019.

In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.

References

Answer: The first and second paragraphs are acceptable as they are written in a neutral tone and backed up by RS. However, the third paragraph is not acceptable per BLPREMOVE because that piece of information isn't backed up by any sources.

Y.he last paragraph about Murray is unsourced and is contentious material as per WP:GOSSIP, WP:GRAPEVINE. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

---

4. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213. Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km).

References

Answer: Everything is ok (neutral and backed up by RS) except the address and phone no. information per BLPPRIVACY.

Y Taddress and the phone number should be removed as it violates [[WP:]]. the way, the address and tel belong to the White House. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

---

Images copyright

Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Public domain image resources. Please answer the questions below and (1) with explanation based on Wikipedia guidelines and (2) provide the guidelines/links in your answer.

5. Could this image-1 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Yes, as images produced by the US government are considered to be in the public domain.

Y public domain images can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer - link/guideline: Wikipedia:Public domain#US government works

Y Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

6. Could this image-2 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Yes, it can be used as the website says that "This image was acquired from Flickr. It was marked as Public Domain or CC0 and is free to use. To verify, go to the source and check the information there."

Y. We also always need to check the "original site" (the original source) that the image is in PD (public domain). If we click on the flickr link provided on the right of the image it will take your to [2] where it was uploaded by the owner and stated public domain (PD) there.

Answer - link/guideline: The website

Y - and as per guideline: Per WP:PDI. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

7. Could this image-3 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia?

Answer- Explanation: Yes, it can be used because the website says that "Free for use under the Pixabay Content License"

Y . Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer - link/guideline: The original website of the image, permission for modifications for commercial use: "we grant you an irrevocable, worldwide, non-exclusive and royalty-free right to download, use, copy, modify or adapt the Content for commercial or non-commercial purposes"

Y - and as per guideline: Per WP:PDI. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

8. Could this image-4 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: No, fails WP:GETTY #12 and 16.

Y This image can not be used as it violated copyrights as it is someone's work which the copyright has not been released. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Answer - link/guideline: WP:GETTY

Y. One way we could check it to download the image to our computer and use Tineye] where you might able to find some reverse images on the internet. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

---

Neutral point of view

P;lease read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/pharses and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9& 10 from a neutral point of view.

9. She is a brilliant boxer with a rare and exceptional beauty. She turned Pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she destroyed her opponent in 20 seconds. Her talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate and she fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

Answer: "brilliant", "rare and exceptional beauty", "destroyed", "Her talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate" Rewriting: She is a boxer who turned professional at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she defeated her opponent in 20 seconds. She fought under XXX promotion on her next fight in February 2014.

Y Very good!. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

10. He is a popular, acclaimed Bulgarian actor, who loves by all who have watched his films. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was at the tender, innocent of the age of 14 and he has featured in 44 films.

Answer: "popular, acclaimed", "loves by all" (grammatical mistake also), "tender, innocent..." Rewriting: He is a Bulgarian actor born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry at the age of 14. He has featured in 44 films.

Y. Well-done. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

11. Please read WP:DUE and in your own words, please explain why it is important to provide balance and due weight content in an article.

Answer: Inserting minority viewpoints into an article might not be useful to an article especially for a BLP. Wikipedia should be neutral and is not a place to persuade readers to believe in something.

Y Take Capital punishment article for example - it provides a balance and due weight content, representing all mainstream points of view in reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

---

No original research

Please read WP:OR and WP:NOT and answer the questions below

12. In your own words, why Wikipedia is not a platform to publish original research?

Answer: Wikipedia is a platform built with reliable coverage in order to ensure accuracy. Publishing original research threatens Wikipedia's verifiability; therefore, OR must be removed to ensure the quality of Wikipedia.

Y.

13. In your own words, please provide one example with explanation when it is appropriate to insert an original research or an opinion in an article.

Answer: I believe quoting other people's opinions on films or events is okay because it doesn't impact the neutrality of the article.

Y.We could use exact words from the source in the article when (1) it is a public domain sites (2) the author/site has released their copyright and anyone to use the content/image such as " agree to irrevocably agree to release content/image under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL or under the Creative Commons license. (3) a direct quote and provide the source. Example Constitution of the United States and in Robert Whittaker (fighter) page (see below direct quote). Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

In an interview with GQ Australia, he stated:

I am immensely proud to be an Australian and to be a pioneer in the sport to, you know, lead, lead today's MMA scene against all these other countries, you know, it really, it really does light me up, to see that the Australian flag when I walk out, you know, to hear them called out that I'm Australian and I am very patriotic. I am really proud of my country and proud of where I am from.

References

14. See this video and write the content in the in an article by using the video info as the source.

Answer: Sh. Shady Alsuleiman says that according to Islam law, men and women's clothing should be baggy, loose and non see-through. Clothes should not be colorful or attractive, and must be covering the de aura.

Y.Good. Cassiopeia talk

---

Verifiability

Please read WP:V and answer the questions below

15. If the subject has two sons and it is supported by three independent, reliable sources but in reality he has 3 sons. Could we change the content from "2" sons to "3 sons"? and why?

Answer: No per WP:TRUE. Wikipedia is built on top of reliable coverage in order to ensure verifiability and accuracy.

Y. Good. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

---

Timothytyy See assignment 3 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 06:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Completed assignment, please check. Thanks. Timothytyy (talk) 09:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Timothytyy I am so sorry. I had tagged the page for to do list but somehow I thought I have reviewed it and went off for a 6 week vacation and just noticed it was not done. See the comments above and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)