- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Vaughn_Young&diff=next&oldid=15324926
- Robert Vaughn Young
- removed Category:Scientologists
- category text clearly stated at that time that it included former Scn
- Category:Former Scientologists not created until June 23, 2005
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Robert_Vaughn_Young&diff=15714473&oldid=15709386 AI's claim that RVY is not a Scn "even if he once was"
- Removing Free Zone from Category:Scientology
- Article
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=15443536&oldid=15376575
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=17993516 "-cat this does not define Scientology and is already sub-categorized"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18014962 "rv ref:KSW" -- what KSW is is never explained
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18029084 "reverted edits by Antaeus Feldspar to correct version of 1 July 2005, 18:21. See Talk:Free_Zone#Categorization"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18034634 puts on disputed tag which claims that the factual accuracy of the article is disputed
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18097198 "REVERT"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18360214 "REVERT"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18365447 "RV "related" is not the determining word in Wikipedia policy about categories"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18369552 "+disputed tag, the misunderstanding is on Antaeus' part, not mine."
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18606868 "-cat The Free Zone is not Scientology"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18717489 "-cat"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18852014 "-category The FREEZONE is not to be categorized under the main Scientology category. Keep it in Category:Free Zone!"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18910554 "-cat"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18924520 "rv already explained before"
- Talk page
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=18033616&oldid=18028984 - quotes the policy, complete with example to show its proper application, but applies it improperly.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18033616 Disputed
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18034760 it is explained how the policy actually works and that the "disputed" tag is for disputing factual accuracy, not categorization
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18098100 repeats misunderstanding that Free Zone must define the parent category
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18359036 "Quit playing word games and quit wasting my time Antaeus, is Irmgard paying you?"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18359238
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18505500 explained again that the answer is "both the category and the parent category
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18606704 Is the factual accuracy disputed?
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18638806
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18647407 AI changes a section header in order to completely alter the meaning of the next sentence
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=prev&oldid=18647608 AI changes the indentation to make it seem like part of his dispute
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18717776 asks two rhetorical questions...
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18745570 one which proves to have non-rhetorical answer.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18779657 AI tries to shift the subject to the accidental non-signing of a post
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_Zone&diff=next&oldid=18856985 AI tries to justify the "disputed" tag on the article by pointing out that I removed a first-person anon contribution
- Article
- Placing L. Ron Hubbard bibliography in Category:Scientology
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:L._Ron_Hubbard_bibliography&diff=18098901&oldid=17718035 My explanation of why it's being removed
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L._Ron_Hubbard_bibliography&diff=next&oldid=18098695 "rv. What defines scientology? LRH's bibliography"
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L._Ron_Hubbard_bibliography&diff=next&oldid=18369302 "rv edit to most recent version from BTfromLA in contention with Calton and BTfromLA. Antaeus, take a walk."