The crap crop club - work in progress

edit

A perfect demonstration of how obsession and incompetence can overcome aesthetics. Can anyone find portraits anywhere but Wikipedia that are cropped like this? With the top of the head barely inside, and the remaining borders determined by whatever is mandated by an arbitrary aspect ratio some random contributor wants to impose for consistency?

See [1] for context.

See [2] for where to find them. No idea how many of these there are.

Just a pointless 1% crop.

Crop:  

Original:  

Cropping was legitimate, but not like this.

Crop:  

Original:  

Why? Just why? We know why. Because infobox images must be 4x3, and the subjects must fit the box. Barely...

Crop:  

Original:  

Missed the top of his head by the thickness of a credit card.

Crop:  

Original:  

Squeeze the man into the box...

Crop:  

Original:  

For a change, we don't squeeze the guy. Inflate him instead, into a blur...

Crop:  

Original:  

The universe is 3/4 as wide as it is high. Because Wikipedia says so...

Crop:  

Original:  

Meh. Maybe an improvement, but not because arbitrary ratios are a good idea.

Crop:  

Original:

I'm sure there were people that would have liked to squeeze Bill into a box, even back in '87...

Crop:  

Original:  

Cropped with all the aesthetic discrimination of a potato-peeling machine...

Crop:  

Original:  

Yes, cropping the original is good. But not like this. Give the poor man a little headroom...