This is an archive of past discussions about User:Airborne84. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Airborne84. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of HumanLight
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HumanLight you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of HumanLight
The article HumanLight you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:HumanLight for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 01:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Ethics
Hi Airborne84! This is Jenhawk777. I was hoping that, since you were so nice about it and all, you might be interested in having input into the possible new structure I am attempting to outline for the Bible and ethics article. I am currently beginning to work on it some in my sandbox here: [1] and thought you might be interested in taking a look and making comments--yes I agree, no I don't agree I think this instead--you know the kind of thing we do all the time aftersomeone writes something! Here's a chance to comment before instead. I want you to feel free to edit at will there! I know it's weird to ask someone else to edit your sandbox, but I've done this before, and it works pretty well. If you don't have any comments, or you're too busy, or you just don't feel like it, that's perfectly okay. I just thought I would give you the opportunity. Cheers! Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:23, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Jenhawk777, thanks for the offer. I'll take a look through in the coming few days and pitch in how I can! At a minimum, I'll leave some feedback on your talk page to use how you wish. --Airborne84 (talk) 01:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Airborne84. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Airborne84. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
How many spaces after a period listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect How many spaces after a period. Since you had some involvement with the How many spaces after a period redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 23:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Low resolution image of advertisement for play-by-mail game Hyborian War.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Low resolution image of advertisement for play-by-mail game Hyborian War.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Airborne84. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |