[1]Paragraph: This helps you set the style of the text. For example, a header, or plain paragraph text. You can also use it to offset block quotes.[2]
A : Highlight your text, then click here to format it with bold, italics, etc. The "More" options allows you to underline, add code snippets, and change language keyboards.
Links: The chain button allows you to link your text. Highlight the word, and push the button. VisualEditor will automatically suggest related Wikipedia articles for that word or phrase. This is a great way to connect your article to more Wikipedia content. You only have to link important words once, usually during the first time they appear. If you want to link to pages outside of Wikipedia (for an "external links" section, for example) click on the "External link" tab.
Cite: The citation tool[2] in VisualEditor helps format your citations. You can simply paste a DOI or URL, and the VisualEditor will try to sort out all of the fields you need. Be sure to review it, however, and apply missing fields manually (if you know them). You can also add books, journals, news, and websites manually. That opens up a quick guide for inputting your citations. Finally, you can click the "re-use" tab if you've already added a source and just want to cite it again.
- Bullets: To add bullet points or a numbered list, click here.
Insert: This tab lets you add media, images, or tables.
Ω † allows you to add special characters, such as those found in non-English words, scientific notation, and a handful of language extensions.
 | This is a user sandbox of Abatugo. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Being bold is important on Wikipedia.
Step 2 Assignment
Each fact referenced to appropriate and reliable source: Mostly,
some references include University sites such as the Heidelberg Journal of the Institute for Religious Studies at the University of Heidelberg.
One possibly sketchy reference: The New Yorker, while the article gave a somewhat objective fact. The reference is a magazine and therefore there could be possible bias in the source (read through some aspects of the article)
Reference to the book Extra Lives: Links to a wikipedia page, when I go to the references to that article, one is a missing link (already makes it seems sketchy,)
Overall, most of the sources seem to be opinion pieces
There is one item under the title "Use of religious elements" in which there is not detail about the aspects in which certain portrayals of religion has been criticized.
Even though the article draws upon opinion based sources, it is generally very neutral, author is simply stating the facts and is making info gathered from opinionated sources seem neutral.
Information:
- ^ Google, retrieved 2017-02-23
- ^ a b "Wikipedia". wikipedia.org (in multiple languages). Retrieved 2017-02-16.