Hi There,
I read your article on Bruce Fancher - I have know him closely for 20 years and I have to say, you have a lot of bile for him in this article. Though it lists his achievements, it also very much seems to try to paint him in a bad light. Pretty obvious actually. I do not know what kind of vendetta you have against him, but frankly one of the photos you used was from a party in 2001 where Bruce was not even drinking - haven given that up almost ten years ago. Furthermore, I don't exactly know who copyrighted that image because it was at a party I held...
Just clean this article up right now before I log a formal dispute. Wikipedia is place for slander.
Passdream Passdream1 17:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi passdream. Thanks for your note, I have made effort to reference any statement I made and researched the material that I wrote. I didn't personally edit Fancher's life, tell him how to present himself to the world or do any of the things he has done that maybe questionable. To answer your question about where the photos come from, they're from the MindVox collection which is released into the public domain by the owner of the photographs, which seems to be Bruce Fancher. They are also online at his own web site. I didn't fill it up with all the photos and there are a lot of crazy ones to choose from, which Fancher himself has put online. [1]
We are back to I am not Fancher's PR firm and never told him how to present himself to the world. I have done my best to present a NPOV which does in fact as you stated, list all of his accomplishments which are considerable. If I have missed any, then why don't you add them in.
If it's any consolation, if Fancher was a nice competent person who wasn't over the edge, then nobody would really care or spend all that time researching him and the lunatic asylum called MindVox. It's all very interesting. Being smart or interesting, doesn't make him a nice or well adjusted person, if you read some of the refs or view the photos, I did not take anything out of context and there is a lot of dirt in there to choose from about almost any topic you can name, including racism. I didn't put any of that into the article either. I did my best to present a neutral point of view, present positive and negative, do no original research, reference all my statements, and conform to the Wikipedia guidelines.