User:129.32.224.73/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article edit

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

  • Name of article: (link) Quesadilla
  • Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I have chosen to evaluate this article because it does not have much information on the history of quesadillas

Lead edit

Guiding questions
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Lead evaluation edit

Content edit

Guiding questions
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes
  • Is the content up-to-date? yes
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Content evaluation edit

Tone and Balance edit

Guiding questions
  • Is the article neutral? yes
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
  • Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Tone and balance evaluation edit

Sources and References edit

Guiding questions
  • Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
  • Are the sources current? most of them are not
  • Check a few links. Do they work?yes

Sources and references evaluation edit

Organization edit

Guiding questions
  • Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
  • Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
  • Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes, history, regions, variations

Organization evaluation edit

Images and Media edit

Guiding questions
  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? yes
  • Are images well-captioned? yes but it does include a picture of blue corn quesadilla with not information on those types of quesadillas
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

Images and media evaluation edit

Checking the talk page edit

Guiding questions
  • What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? how they are differently made
  • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? no
  • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? mentions different places in the US where they take a twist to it

Talk page evaluation edit

Overall impressions edit

Guiding questions
  • What is the article's overall status? good
  • What are the article's strengths? the information of variations of quesadillas
  • How can the article be improved? more information where its popular and how it was developed/ why
  • How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? well developed

Overall evaluation edit

Optional activity edit

  • Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~ How/when did quesadillas get popular in the US?

  • Link to feedback: