Evaluate an article edit
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Nuclear gene
- I chose to evaluate this article because it is on the to-do list of the Molecular Biology project.
Lead edit
- The article only includes a short factual description of what a Nuclear gene is. It does not have sections. Its level of detail is fine but it is confusing.
Content edit
- The article is relevant and up to date. Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
Tone and Balance edit
- The article is neutral and factual.Is the article neutral?
Sources and References edit
- The facts are backed up by just a few sources. They are exclusively books but no primary literature.
Organization edit
- Guiding questions
- I find it uneasy to read. No grammar or spelling error though.
Images and Media edit
- It does not include any image or media.
Checking the talk page edit
- Not much is going on in the Talk page. The article is part of the Molecular Biology/Genetics project.
Overall impressions edit
- The article looks like a draft with not much information. One of the comments on the Talk page says there should be no redirect from Nuclear genome to Nuclear gene. I think there should be a redirect from Nuclear Gene to Nuclear genome. It could be improved by, either, adding details regarding the specificities of Nuclear genes, or fusing this with Nuclear genome.