Template talk:WikiProject Ignosticism

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Royalmate1 in topic Why is the template not working?
WikiProject iconAtheism Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.


To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Be consistent

  • Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
  • Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
  • Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Articles to improve

Create

  • Articles on notable atheists


Expand

Immediate attention

  • State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
  • False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
  • Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
  • Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.

Why is the template not working? edit

By that I mean, if I use {{WikiProject Ignosticism |class=c |importance=top }}, the importance and class of the article will not appear. I compared the source of the template with other banners and there aren't any differences except the name of the project, the image file etc. Tetra quark (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

The template itself probably has to be edited. @TetraQuark RoyalMate1 22:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply