Template talk:Unichar/main/sandbox

Tested edit

About this edit: is it tested well, esp with spacing characters? After all, it is a formatting template, so there might be a reason to force control on whitespaces &tc. -DePiep (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC) moved to bett

My change was from

{{unichar/glyph . . .}}<!--NAME-->{{zwsp}}&#x20;{{unichar/na . . .}}

to

{{unichar/glyph . . .}} <!--NAME-->{{unichar/na . . .}}

I used unichar/testcases, including the blue bits such as under template:unichar/testcases#Spaces, and played with narrow browser widths. I could not find any change in the wrapping after the character or blue box. I have since applied this to the live version at unichar/main. Is there anything in particular you thought might be a problem? Also I’m curious why you originally included the ZWSP and escaped ordinary space. Vadmium (talk, contribs) 05:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC).

All OK. I was a bit too careful. -DePiep (talk) 12:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)