This template is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thelema, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ThelemaWikipedia:WikiProject ThelemaTemplate:WikiProject ThelemaThelema articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi pipo tell me how does one join the thelema organisation?
The purpose of a Wikipedia talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. --Rodneyorpheus (talk) 08:47, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Should we include Jack Parsons (rocket engineer) in the list of key figures? That is, does the Book of Babalon make him different than those who simply regurgitate(d) Crowley to feed to their baby chicks? (eg. Hymens A & B, Seckler, DuQuette, Wasserman, etc.). The figures I've added have all added something to the modern views and practices of Thelema. Grant and the darkside of the tree, Lees and his English Qaballa, and Nema with her receipt of a holy book and her interweaving of the dimension of Ma'at with that of Horus. Yeah, I think I answered my own question, Jack deserves to be in. Skyerise (talk) 02:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
@Skyerise: The new changes look good me; much better than before. It's a bit long though. I've been considering making this template collapsible, to make it more compact, so it doesn't displace images, "see also" lists, refs, etc. on shorter articles. What do you think, should I do it? Shouldn't take long. -- Scyrme (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sure, that sounds productive... Skyerise (talk) 17:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
We should probably take ceremonial magic out of the methods section, since it's listed as Magick in the core concepts section. Don't want to accidentally step on your edits, so leaving it for now. Skyerise (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Skyerise: It's done; how does it look? Had to make it a bit wider, but most sidebars are so I think it's worth it. Btw, you want to look over the navbox, Template:Thelema series; it still has some old links that don't reflect your mergers. -- Scyrme (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Looks good, but could you change is so it doesn't put AA and OAA together like that? make it look like a single entry. Skyerise (talk) 17:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Done. I put it at the end. Putting it in alphabetical order made the list look messy. -- Scyrme (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I found a better but counterintuitive solution which leaves them on the same line but more clearly separated. Skyerise (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply