Template talk:Taxonomy/Holozoa
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Snoteleks in topic Template-protected edit request on 7 June 2023
 | Template:Taxonomy/Holozoa is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.
|
Template-protected edit request on 21 February 2023 edit
This taxon is a clade and needs to show up as such, not as 'unranked'. ☽ Snoteleks ☾ 12:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 11 May 2023 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "unranked" to "cladus". ☽ Snoteleks ☾ 20:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit template-protected}}template. Please get consensus at Talk:Holozoa for this change. Also, while you're there, it would be useful to have a reference listed here in the "Taxonomic references:" box; can the page watchers at that page decide on a good one to use on this page? – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 7 June 2023 edit
| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Changed "unranked" to "cladus" and add the following reference: {{cite journal| vauthors = Paps J, Medina-Chacón LA, Marshall W, Suga H, Ruiz-Trillo I | title = Molecular Phylogeny of Unikonts: New Insights into the Position of Apusomonads and Ancyromonads and the Internal Relationships of Opisthokonts | journal = Protist | volume = 164 | issue = 1 | date = 2013 | pages = 2–12 | doi = 10.1016/j.protis.2012.09.002 }} ☽ Snoteleks ☾ 19:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not done for now: editor Snoteleks, you were informed last month that this requires a consensus before going forward. A source is good, but it's not a consensus. Has this been discussed anywhere? If so, then please link to the discussion. Thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 22:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly I didn't activate notifications for the last request before this one, so I hadn't noticed your response until now. I'm trying to get a discussion going on, hopefully at least one person responds. ☽ Snoteleks ☾ 23:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)