Template talk:Separation of powers

Chinese section bullied in?

I am not a heavy wikimedia editor, but I believe this template has been edited by someone from the Chinese Ministry of Propaganda. There is absolutely no academic basis for calling the Chinese system a separation of powers. This is a false equivalency between a genuine separation of powers and the internal divisions that the communist party, of it's own volition, creates in its own power structure. I suggest a serious edit, undertaken by an editor. 97.105.199.198 (talk) 16:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

What about Judicial Activism?

I believe it should be there Pokedora (talk) 14:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)