This template is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Template:S-npo is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Someone apparently shoved Freemasonry in here under the npo template, and the title is ungrammatical. I'd rather it read "Masonic offices", but the template won't let me edit it, and it seems to keep kicking me from one page to another. MSJapan (talk) 01:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
This template is not protected, so you should be able to edit it. This seems reasonable, so I have made the change. --—— Gadget850 (Ed)talk - 12:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Masonic offices are not really important enough to merit a Succession box... so I have simply removed it from the list. Blueboar (talk) 13:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
