Template talk:Private Universities of Bangladesh/Archive 1

Instead of putting this large and growing list of private unis under the broader category of Univeristies of Bangladesh, I have put them down under a new category - Private Univeristies of Bangladesh. If you think that was not appropriate I'm always willing to discuss. - Aditya Kabir 12:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

University of South Asia

Bangladesh Observer, the longest surviving English newspaper from Dhaka, seems to think there is a University of South Asia in Bangladesh (please, check here), though User:NAHID believes otherwise. Please, do not keep reverting valid contributions, that's vandalism. I'm trying to find a full list of the mushrooming score of public universities in Bangladesh. It's not available on-line, so I have to go on-ground. With the time I can spare to do that, it would be tough, but not impossible. Give me a week or something. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 15:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

• Without any verifiable source we shouldn't use materials in an article / template. That won't be productive. --NAHID 22:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Most right. Now, can you help to add verifiable sources for the enormous number of names you added to the template, but most still are just red links, thus unverified? I have already done that for University of South Asia. Thanks for reminding a core principal. Aditya Kabir 05:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Huh, Are you trying to make new universities list in both Public/Private univ templates, that you are trying to get from ground. Before making this template, some public/private universities were existed in List of universities in Bangladesh, some I found from web sources/newspapers.One weblink were existed with article, which included the univ list.It might be removed from that list. I also found another website but couldn't remember that. Same thing happend with Public University template, that was created by User:Hermitage17. However, Newspapers also mention the univ name that may not be included with website.And how can you judge red link as unverified? Are you bearing to add material to those red links? You could've mentioned the link of University of South Asia when you were trying to add it in template. Indeed, you already mentioned the link and it makes clear point. I searched GOOGLE with University of South Asia but it always showed this univ belongs to Pakistan (you may find it in edit history). That made big confusion. Thanks --NAHID 20:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, I think I will add new names to the template, if I can arrange to lay my hands on the complete list and if the list shows there are more names to add. The University Grants Commission office in Agaragaon has that list, and it may be available to you too. For Google, next time when you are looking for something try adding more words to the search string for better results (like - "University of South Asia" Bangladesh - instead of just - University of South Asia). Check Google search help for more tips. I didn't mention the links, and rather asked you to Google for it, because I believed you can use Google properly. Sorry about that. Aditya Kabir 04:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Again refrain from edit war. I should've mentioned "University of South Asia Bangladesh" (It was the search point NOT University of South Asia) instead of University of South Asia in above section. The reference you mentioned that doesn't deal only with University of South Asia Bangladesh. Other universities are also available there.And You found it from that certain online newspapers not from Google. Looks like You created the GOOGLE (I salute you for that) and You only person know the use of GOOGLE :0 Please Check and search it again and learn yourself first (how to use it properly), then suggest others. I'm sorry that you're suggesting without knowing it.--NAHID 15:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

P.S. From my talk page, you wroteI am happy that you finally have answered to any of my postings that concern you. Sorry, there's no need to be happy here.I don't know what bias encourages you to wasting your efforts as well as others. My be you'll come up with more paragraphs for getting responds !! Sigh......

University of South Asia 2

Thanks for providing specific informations. Regarding on this statement Please, do not keep reverting valid contributions, that's vandalism-- I just want to say, You should've mentioned the link before my reverting. I'm not taking it otherwise.However, We shouldn't test on an template or article. As User:Aditya Kabir attempted to do that.

And also: Without any reason User:Aditya Kabir Repeated (POV Vandalism) same University links (see here) in the template, those were already existed. Also, Engaging edit war isn't acceptable (See Wikipedia:Edit war). It's easy to write / put something from own thoughts and that can't be helpful practise. So please refrain that. Thanks--NAHID 19:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

• Would you like to explain why you think an oversight (for which I apologize already - Sorry, Dude) is equal to POV Vandalism? Also, if possible, can you explain why you think reverting someone else's removal of a valid contribution (provided along with ample reference and a tool to verify - i.e. Google - none which the other person provided) is equal to edit warring? I apologize for missing the point here. Aditya Kabir 05:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Stop riddles please.You could make more points (whatever comes to your mind) ! You did what you like by repeating the links. And your VALID cotribution refered the Pakistani University that I mentioned above (read above section again). And repeating the link again and again without any valid reseon isn't acceptable.For avoiding confusion, You could've mentioned it before.Thanks --NAHID 21:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
  • What "repeating the links"? Are you talking about the "evidence" you provided above? Haven't you noticed I already mentioned that is was an oversight, an apologized for it? What is making you so confused? Please, take a deep breath, sit back and relax. It is fine. The earth hasn't fallen apart. Aditya Kabir 04:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • No, I'm not confused. It'd be better if you followed this procedure-take a deep breath, sit back and relax. No need to mention the universal matters. Please stop referring these types of material in article / template talk page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NAHID (talk • contribs) 14:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC).
    • I am sorry. I hope you can forgive me for hurting your feelings. Aditya Kabir 18:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
    • It's Okay.--NAHID 23:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

P.S. This is for User:NAHID

If you had done what I suggested on my last edit use comment (did you try searching for - "university of south asia" bangladesh - with google search?) you would have found about the University of South Asia in Bangladesh already. When you do that, you find a lot of Wikipedia mirrors on the first page of serch results. But, you also get a mirror of the Observer report on the site of Sustainable Development Networking Programme. On the second page you would have found two references on the Observer online. On that page you would have also found a downloadable pdf file on the British Council for Prevention of Blindness site. bangladesh-nerdy.com. provides with an address and contact numbers:

H #76, 78, R #14
Block #B, Banani, Dhaka
Tele: +88-02-8857073-5
Mob: 0171525499, 018144868
Fax: +88-02-8313308
E-mail: unsia@citech-bd.com

You can also find references on the New Age, the fastest growing English newspaper in Bangladesh - here and here. The Japanese Association of Veterinary Anatomic website has another downloadable pdf file on it that quotes the university on the third page for Google search finding when you use the string I suggested.

Please, keep your cool (See: Wikipedia:No angry mastodons). Working hard on some category is not rationale enough for attempted vandalism. Nobody owns the articles they contribute to (See: Wikipedia:Ownership of articles). Take a break, take some time off, and come back again. May be you can stop fighting the system when you feel better. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 16:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

P.S. 2

I searched the link before, but google didn't show it up. And...

You may have misunderstood me again. Please read what I mentioned in above section. I read those WP pages before. You'd better read WP:Edit war again. Also Please avoid wrong justification. Thanks--NAHID 18:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)