Template talk:Philosophy of religion
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FWD?
editIs Plantinga's free will defense notable enough to be included in this template? Gabbe (talk) 18:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- I think that Plantinga work on philosophy of religion is important enought to include him on this template. --Vojvodae please be free to write :) 17:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Russian philosophers
editI have added some Russian philosophers represents of Russian religious philosophy who contributed to philosophy of religion.--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 21:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
New Thought Movement
editCould or Should New Thought be included in this Template?66.108.86.141 (talk) 03:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Intelligent design
editIntelligent design is not mentioned once in the main Philosophy of religion article, so I would question whether it merits inclusion as one of its core 'Concepts'. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2018
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Inside the section on 'The Problem of Evil', add Alvin Plantinga's free-will defense, probably the most accepted response and far worthier of a place than Augustine's answer. 86.179.170.16 (talk) 22:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. If that response is the most accepted, please create a well sourced article about it. As it stands now, Augustine's answer has an article, while this doesn't. DannyS712 (talk) 23:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
