This template is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Preferably to "Filipino cuisine" to keep consistency with other templates. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 21:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have moved the page since there seemed to be no objection. The creator of the template had already renamed the template prior to the move. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 04:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
You were pretty quick about it Jeffrey! But no objection from me. Lambanog (talk) 10:33, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Removing the Kapampangan section because it seems to unbalance the template. Nasing Biringyi I would also argue is not a generally well-known dish in the Philippine context. Undue weight is given to both. If there are additional entries that can be included to provide balance and a more holistic perspective then later inclusion makes sense. I will preserve the code here:
Yes. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 11:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)