Template talk:Non-English-language text category

WikiProject iconLanguages Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCategories
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Categories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of categories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

extra space

edit

please remove extra space after pipe of category or simply change "Category:Articles containing non-English language text| " to "Category:Articles containing non-English language text|". This extra space has made Category:Articles containing non-English language text this:)Ladsgroupبحث 00:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks:)Ladsgroupبحث 04:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Prohibition should be relaxed

edit

The blurb text currently reads: "This category should only be added with the {{Lang}} family of templates, never explicitly." I don't think this is a wise prohibition. Sometimes the name is given in a foreign language before the English, thus making use of the {{Lang}} template inapproriate. In those instances, for the lack of a multilingual support template which covers such cases, we should be allowed to add this category directly to the articles, as is possible with other hidden maintenance categories such as Category:Year of birth missing. __meco (talk) 09:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

One reason to add categories manually is when nesting categories.--Error (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

LargeCategory TOC

edit

Can someone modify this so that if the contents are larger then 3,000, {{LargeCategoryTOC}} is used instead of {{Category TOC}}? Vegaswikian (talk) 02:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template documentation

edit

Please create template documentation of this article. --kwan-in (talk) 08:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Redrose64 (talk) 12:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Miscategorisation

edit

Some recent changes by Zyxw (talk · contribs) are putting categories inside themselves, for example ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Articles containing Chinese-language text; ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Articles containing Havasupai-Hualapai-Yavapai-language text; and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Articles containing Mohave-language text. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Redrose64: Thanks for pointing this out. It was caused by the {{Lang-x}} examples. I have fixed the three categories you mentioned and will fix any others that I find. -- Zyxw (talk) 10:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
  Thank you --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Increase parameter count

edit

Please provide a seventh parameter so that Category:Articles containing undetermined-language text doesn't truncate the last (sixth) entry: "Template:ISO 639 name und-lat." Thanks, --User:Usien6 17:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

By the way, if someone can figure out how the heck are some articles ending up in Category:Articles containing Undetermined-language text, (notice the miscapitalization) please reach me through my talk page… Thank you --User:Usien6 17:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Usien6:   Partly done I added the parameter, but have left the request open in case someone can answer your miscategorization question.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  20:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Usien6: A one-character edit to Module:Language/data/iana languages would fix the "Undetermined" category name. I don't know if there would be side-effects, so I'll ping Trappist the monk, who has been working on the "lang" templates. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Dear @SMcCandlish: Dear @John of Reading: Thank you for your prompt replies. The miscategorization issue is now fixed. The truncation of the seventh parameter is not, though. Even after purging. Please, reconsider, --User:Usien6 11:36, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Usien6: Should be fixed now? I edited {{Category articles containing non-English-language text/core}} and {{Category articles containing non-English-language text/inner core}} -- John of Reading (talk) 12:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
I missed something in sub-templates? Incontheivable!  ;-)  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  14:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
  Thank you It works fine, now --User:Usien6 15:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Template name incorrect in examples

edit

The template name is incorrect (in different ways) in each of the usage examples. DferDaisy (talk) 00:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

~/inner core

edit

Template:Category articles containing non-English-language text/inner core is responsible for the right-floating box with the heading: "This category is indirectly triggered by the templates". I think that this is not true. None of the templates in ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:ISO 639 name from code templates that I inspected – just a few, there are 1100+ templates in that category – emit categories. Further, ~/inner core says:

This category should only be added with the {{Lang}} family of templates, never explicitly.

One last tidbit: there is a slow-burning move afoot to deprecate and remove all of the {{ISO 639 name <code>}} templates in favor of a single parameterized template {{ISO 639 name|<code>}} that uses Module:ISO 639 name (which shares data files with Module:Lang).

So the questions are:

  1. Should ISO 639 language templates (individual or parameterized) categorize?
    1. If yes:
      • Should the ISO 639 templates share the same categories as those purportedly reserved for {{lang}}?
        1. If categories should not be shared:
          • How shall the ISO 639 language categories be distinguished from the existing categories?
      • In view of the slow-burn move towards deprecation and removal, should implementation of categorization be deferred to the parameterized template?
    2. If no:
      • Shall ~/inner core be edited to remove the right-floating box?

Trappist the monk (talk) 16:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Slow burn caught a gust of wind: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 14 § ISO 639 name from code templates
Trappist the monk (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
There having been no discussion, and because the TfD closed as delete, I have removed the right-floating box from Template:Category articles containing non-English-language text/inner core.
Trappist the monk (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

template errors

edit

Gonnym, are you aware that there are now 33 tranclusions of this generating an error. If not, see Category:Lang and lang-xx template errors. Thanks MB 17:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Misidentification of PIE

edit

Category:Articles containing Piro-language text points to Piro language which is a disambiguation page. It should point to Piro Pueblo language. --Error (talk) 12:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I believe Trappist the monk will be able to fix that. – Uanfala (talk) 14:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Template working strangely at Category:Articles containing Kuman (Russia)-language text

edit

This template is working strangely at ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Articles containing Kuman (Russia)-language text. It links to the disambiguation page Kuman language instead of Kuman (Russia) language, which is what I would expect, given the category name. Compounding the confusion, there are two language articles claiming the ISO 639 code "qwm": Fergana Kipchak language (the redirect target for Kuman (Russia) language) and Cuman language. Can anyone here explain/fix any of this? This situation makes me think of the immortal Dire Straits line "Two men say they're Jesus; one of them must be wrong."Jonesey95 (talk) 02:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fixed the categories Category:Articles containing Kuman (Papua New Guinea)-language text (kue) and Category:Articles containing Kuman (Russia)-language text (qwm). Category:Articles containing Kumam-language text (kdi) does not need fixing; note the name 'Kumam', not 'Kuman'.
The articles that claim qwm will have to be addressed elsewhere; perhaps at Talk:Fergana Kipchak language and / or Talk:Cuman language or even better at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages. The ISO 639-3 custodian defines qwm as 'Kuman (Russia)'.
Trappist the monk (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Looks good. I posted a note for the WikiProject. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply