This template is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York Jets, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Football League/New York Jets subprojectWikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/New York Jets subprojectTemplate:WikiProject New York JetsNational Football League/New York Jets subproject articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Am I mistaken, or is a corresponding move needed to make room for Chris Davis being added? I'm not looking to make any changes, I just want to know if I need to be on the lookout for another move.►Chris NelsonHolla! 01:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
No, the Jets went with 52 players last weekend. Clowney was released, Vilma went to the IR, and only Chatham was activated, leaving 52. Pats1T/C 14:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I do not believe Smith will be suspended until next Monday. Why would be be forced tow miss two weeks of practice, rather than one for a one-game suspension, simply because his team is on a bye this week? If the Jets played this upcoming weekend, he'd miss this week and the game. Since they have a bye, he'd miss TWO weeks of practice and the game two weeks from now. That doesn't make sense to me. It's a one-game suspension, and this week. Therefore I don't think he'll be suspended until next week.►Chris NelsonHolla! 01:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Good point. Pats1T/C 01:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Alright cool. I just don't think it'd be fair to force a guy to miss two weeks of practice rather than one just because his team's on a bye.►Chris NelsonHolla! 01:21, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion
Why is the roster always in alphabetic all year round even during the season when it should realy be in the starting position.--Mr. Unknown (talk) 20:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
It's not a depth chart, it's a roster. Going into the depth aspects make things too complicated.►Chris NelsonHolla! 20:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
(ec) Because that's the correct way to do it, the alphabetical order makes it easier to locate a player if you're looking for them.--Giants27 (c|s) 20:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Define "starter." Pats1T/C 20:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I see all your points. And Pats1 starter would be 1st string, 2nd string, etc.--Mr. Unknown (talk) 01:24, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, and so who is the first string cornerback? Which one do you list first? Do you put safeties before corners? Pats1T/C 01:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Lightoil (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Lightoil (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)