Template talk:NRHP in Kentucky by county

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Bgwhite in topic Missing list markup
WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Kentucky Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Kentucky.

Missing list markup

edit

the use of list markup was recently changed to pipes with the rationale being that pipes are easier to read. well, it turns out you can change the appearance of horizontal lists everywhere, with a simple change to your own personal common.css file. I have posted more details at MediaWiki talk:Common.css, but in brief

  1. Open common.css
  2. Add
.hlist dd:after,
.hlist li:after {
    content: " | ";
    font-weight: normal;
}

and all the bullets will change to pipes. the problem with not using list markup is basic accessibility, since the list is not parse as a list by screen readers. we should change this back to horizontal lists unless there is a more compelling reason not to do so. Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

The use of the pipe format definitely is not better for screen readers. Bullets are also the common format for these types of lists. Bgwhite (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply