Template talk:NRDB species
Latest comment: 1 year ago by BarrelProof in topic MOS:DATETIES
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Template-protected edit request on 14 December 2021
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi, is it please possible to derive a Czech (cz) clone of "NRDB species"? Thank you Miroslav Ličko (talk) 08:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not done (as to the immediate edit request), please make your edits in Template:NRDB species/sandbox and validate prior to reactivation. Feel free to continue to discuss improvements to this template below. — xaosflux Talk 11:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
MOS:DATETIES
editCan someone please provide an example of how to use this template with the American (MDY) date format per MOS:DATETIES? — BarrelProof (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- I found a way, although it's a bit ugly:
- {{NRDB species|genus=Crotalus|species=cerastes|date=April 22,|year=2010}}
- produces
- Crotalus cerastes at the Reptarium.cz Reptile Database. Accessed April 22, 2010.
- Notice the unusual use of a comma after "April 22" in the template input. I had tried
- {{NRDB species|genus=Crotalus|species=cerastes|date=April 22, 2010}}
- but that produces
- Crotalus cerastes at the Reptarium.cz Reptile Database. Accessed April 22, 2010 {{{year}}}.
- which has an obvious "{{{year}}}" error in the outcome.
- — BarrelProof (talk) 19:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Can't you just write:
- {{NRDB species|genus=Crotalus|species=cerastes|access-date=March 26, 2023}}
- to get:
- Crotalus cerastes at the Reptarium.cz Reptile Database. Accessed March 26, 2023.
- I'm not sure what the purpose of the separate date/year fields was, since the database itself doesn't seem to be versioned. Hqb (talk) 20:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oh. Yes, that's much better. Somehow I just didn't think of that! I guess the other uses of the template that I had seen were using
|date=
and|year=
and I just didn't think to use|access-date=
. — BarrelProof (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Oh. Yes, that's much better. Somehow I just didn't think of that! I guess the other uses of the template that I had seen were using
- Can't you just write: