Talk:Properties of metals, metalloids and nonmetals
(Redirected from Template talk:Metals-metalloids-nonmetals: compare, details/sandbox)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Emmystickx in topic Civic education
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Authors who count metalloids as nonmetals
editIncidentally I intend to undo one of your recent edits, the one that changed "Some authors count metalloids as nonmetals with weakly nonmetallic properties" to "Most authors…", unless you have a citation that supports the "Most authors…" opening. The examples I provided can only be interpreted as evidence that some (rather than most) authors count metalloids as nonmetals instead of metalloids. Happy to discuss. Sandbh (talk) 09:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Sandbh: (I assume you mean me) I replaced "some" with "most" because I removed "Others count some of the metalloids as post-transition metals with weakly metallic properties.", which has been unsourced for two years now. I couldn't find any examples of authors counting metalloids as PT metals, but I could find many who count them as nonmetals. It seems like a reasonable deduction that most authors count them as nonmetals if no examples to the contrary are found. Regardless, the unsourced line should be removed. Thanks, Laurdecl talk 08:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Laurdecl: Yes, good assumption. I've added a citation giving an example of some authors who count Ge and Sb as PTMs. Sandbh (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Tables moved into templates
edit- I have moved two tables into templates, so they are transcluded. This is very helpful for testing (sandboxing). Also, I have made two level-3 subsections with that: "Overview" and "Details". Especially since that detailes-table is so huge.
- Suggestion: let's move paragraph: "Authors differ in where they divide metals ..." to above, as an introduction of the main section 'compare' (there should be text in there anyway, and this one fits fine). -DePiep (talk) 03:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please go ahead DePiep. Sandbh (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Did not do this text move. Text flow does not seem natural anyway (needed, maybe: from introduction of the properties into global remarks?). Someone else? -DePiep (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- {{Metals-metalloids-nonmetals: compare, overview}}
- {{Metals-metalloids-nonmetals: compare, details}}
- Cleaned up the two tables. I'll leave this page for now. -DePiep (talk) 12:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Did not do this text move. Text flow does not seem natural anyway (needed, maybe: from introduction of the properties into global remarks?). Someone else? -DePiep (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please go ahead DePiep. Sandbh (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Civic education
editWhat is the meaning of UDHR Emmystickx (talk) 15:24, 10 May 2021 (UTC)