The use of a template to include the image, dates, gauge, etc is incorrect. An Infobox in the main article is the correct method and included additional information. The template should only be used for the route diagram. This is also the correct use of rail icons and corrects some factual errors. Dbromage [Talk] 06:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Your changes are just as bad, full of errors! Whether this old template be the infobox or not, you're required to discuss major changes such as this but you didn't, not one word. Bidgee (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
- The Wikipedia community encourages users to be bold when updating the encyclopedia. If you believe the template contains errors, fix it or point out the errors so they can be fixed. By the way, the source for all the additional information is the same source as for the previous template. You are the only one saying it is controversial and disputing the changes but you have not said what it is you are actually disputing. Dbromage [Talk] 04:56, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have removed collapsible elements because they display badly on mobiles and don't provide much benefit on PCs. Maybe somebody know how to fix displays on mobiles and can return them.--Grahame (talk) 03:52, 22 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
