Template talk:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency

2 new fields required for the Template

edit

Two parameters should be added. When a seat is split or reformed, we do not have basic parameters to navigate to it's predecessor and successor. For Example, Chepauk (state assembly constituency) and Triplicane (state assembly constituency) were merged and reformed as Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni (State Assembly Constituency). Some reference should be there in Page Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni (State Assembly Constituency) where preceding Constituency name should be named as Chepauk (state assembly constituency) and Triplicane (state assembly constituency). In both Chepauk (state assembly constituency) and Triplicane (state assembly constituency) Pages, succeeding Page should be navigated to Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni (State Assembly Constituency). -Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 06:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

This template does not work

edit
  Resolved

For reasons unknown to me. See this diff where the Template:Infobox Vidhan Sabha constituency worked like a charm and this failed. @MPGuy2824, can you please check the diff.

"Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency" is a mess. Template:Infobox Vidhan Sabha constituency should not be deleted until the bugs on this infobox are resolved. The Template:Infobox state assembly constituency seems to be a better choice for the final merged template, for the purpose of brevity. --Venkat TL (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@DaxServer lets focus on the essential parameters first, to make sure they are all working. I raised this above. Not sure if these are fixed by the recent updates. Venkat TL (talk) 16:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
The issues seem to have been fixed with the recent updates to the templates. --Venkat TL (talk) 08:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Most successful party

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was Remove parameter . -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The |most_successful_party= seems very subjective. Do we want to drop it? — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 15:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm ok with dropping it. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Anybody who wants to keep this needs to speak up soon. If there is no opposition in a week, we'll close this discussion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2 suggested improvements

edit

Hiding Current MLA section for abolished constituencies

edit

Please see [1] and test2 in testcases. If nobody has objections, I'll make the same changes to the template. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Done in [2] -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Merger of this Infobox with Infobox Lok Sabha Constituency

edit

As per the result of the discussion, this template is going to merge with Template:Infobox Lok Sabha Constituency. A new proposed version is provided in the ,sandbox. Give it a look, suggest some changes or help us with finding any errors. You can compare the differences on testcases. For now, it is just a draft version. Prarambh20 (talk) 05:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply