Template talk:Infobox Australian university ranking
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
_-_The_Noun_Project.svg){kind=small}
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2014 October 24. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
| This template was considered for merging with Template:Infobox university rankings on 29 November 2014. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Changes
editI've boldly remove certain fields that are specific to certain sub-disciplines, this was allowing cherry picking of subject rankings such as materials science and geology within the template. I think to be clear we should keep to international and national rankings, otherwise we have to include every subject ranking in the table and that would be a large table! Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- What are the parameters for the CWTS Leiden Ranking in the infobox?
- I'm waiting for a response from a user who would like to have the PP(top 10%) ranking on there.
- I personally have no idea which should be in there. ๐ฃ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐๐ญ๐พ๐ฌ๐ช๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ท ๐๐พ๐ญ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ธ๐ป 16:10, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
reference named auto
editThis template is breaking Southern Cross University because it has explicitly named references which clash with the named references in that article. "auto" is a name created by tools for citation re-use, so is it necessary to include it here? If it must be named, could it be named something less likely to clash. Thanks Kerry (talk) 14:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- I caused that problem, it should be fixed now. Hopefully my change won't break any other pages Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)