Template talk:GAN/preload/Archive 1

recent changes

changes to this template have had the effect of removing the start date of the review, also adding a lot of irrelevant stuff about the reviewwer - can we not just go back to how it was? Jezhotwells (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

I think the start date has already been re-added; see Talk:Adiantum viridimontanum/GA1 for instance. I've removed the editcount link. Ucucha (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Your change was reverted, due to problems with the GA bot. I made a similar change, which should be compatible with GA bot, so hopefully the change will stick this time. Thank you. Frietjes (talk) 23:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict)It is still a mess and appears to make every review "malformed" at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Report. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

That page is only updated once per day? We should wait to see what happens in about 24 hours? I am hopeful that it will work itself out. Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Line break

I added a line break since as it previously stood, editors who started their reviews on the first line after the comment did not break into a new paragraph (e.g., 612377777). czar ♔ 22:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)