Template talk:Fu Manchu (band)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Hahc21 in topic Requested move
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. → Call me Hahc21 02:59, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
– Two birds with one stone! I know generally template titles don't matter a great deal, but when there's a primary topic for Fu Manchu with its own navbox, it makes sense to disambiguate the secondary topic. And despite the name, Template:Fu Manchu films covers more than films, so it might as well match the corresponding article too. We'll just need to update the transclusions of this one. BDD (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support, the films matter most. Torquemama007 (talk) 18:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support band move, matches the band article, as it makes no sense considering there are other Fu Manchus about on Wikipedia that have a better claim on the title. Also better name for the other template as it is not a fictional universe template. -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 05:03, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Consistency with the wp:primarytopic articles. walk victor falk talk 08:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support disambiguation of band, Oppose ambiguation of film template there is no urgency with templates to create ambiguous template names. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.