This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Big question - should this template really have been spared from deletion in a recent discussion? Some editors raised what they thought was valid points, and the nominator withdrew on the belief that was the case. But I am not certain they were justified, and that the nominator withdrew the discussion too soon. What do you think:
@GUtt01: you're asking to revise the consensus that was just established under a week ago. I recommend this brought up in WT:VG.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
This isn't a suitable RfC. Even though a withdrawal isn't strictly speaking suitable for a nomination where there is a delete !vote; inciting an RfC over whether it should be closed or not is not suitable. I recommend opening a discussion at WT:VG and discussing the template. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs) 14:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
