Template talk:Education in the U.S.

Do not link to generic issues

This template has certain links to articles that do not discuss US-specific issues. This makes it look as if Educational accreditation is only relevant in the US. Either make US-specific articles if needed (probably not yet), such as Educational accredidation in the United States, or drop these from the template. Sda030 (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

I strongly disagree. Educational accreditation is primarily relevant only to the United States, in the sense of a regular peer review process with relatively weak government supervision. Most other countries take a much stricter top-down approach to licensing and regulation of educational institutions. Yes, there are scattered instances of educational institutions outside the United States seeking various kinds of accreditation, but it's not systematic and widely accepted as in the United States. --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)