Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Baháʼu'lláh
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Nythar in topic Template-protected edit request on 30 March 2023
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Template-protected edit request on 30 November 2022
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the sentence "Through extensive and repeated consultations a decision has been made to include the picture at the bottom of the article." as this no longer appears to have consensus per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Baháʼu'lláh. Hemiauchenia (talk) 06:11, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 30 March 2023
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can someone with the necessary permissions please change the wording of this edit notice? The consensus on Talk:Baháʼu'lláh is to include the image in the infobox at the top of the article, not at the bottom.— Nythar (💬-🍀) 11:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Done Let me know if you don't like the current wording. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Koavf: Considering the fact that the article isn't protected, I think it might be better to specify that there is consensus that the image shouldn't be removed. What do you think? — Nythar (💬-🍀) 13:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Again, let me know if you want to workshop language. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Seems accurate now. Thank you. — Nythar (💬-🍀) 14:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Koavf: Considering the fact that the article isn't protected, I think it might be better to specify that there is consensus that the image shouldn't be removed. What do you think? — Nythar (💬-🍀) 13:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)