Template talk:Did you know/Barry Locke

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Crisco 1492
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Barry Locke edit

Created by Hirolovesswords (talk). Self nom at 05:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comment - Great article. You have a controversial sentence in the lede of your article, about the "first" Mass. cabinet member convicted of a felony, which must have a ref. That sentence in the lede needs to be expanded in the body of the article, but it is not mentioned anywhere else.Jarhed (talk) 18:06, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Seems to have been referenced. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Length and creation date check out. Referencing in article checks out (I changed one date to match a source and specified a year in 2 places), and no copyvio or excessive close wording detected ("five counts of conspiracy to commit bribery and larceny" and suchlike I judge to be acceptable reuse for legal precision); however, I had to assume good faith on those facts taken from the paywalled Boston Globe articles that do not appear in the summaries. Hook is adequately referenced, but the article did not actually mention that it was under Nixon, so I have added that. Article is neutral in tone and in balance of parts. The controversial statement mentioned above is no longer in the lede and is adequately referenced, but I added a background detail from a source. Usage is fine; I fixed the one typo I saw. In my judgment, good to go. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply