Template talk:Db-spamuser-notice
 | This template was considered for deletion on 10 January 2011. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
| This template was considered for deletion on 27 May 2012. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Missing header? Comment edit
It appears the template is missing a header. We are given the notice to put this on a userpage {{subst:spam-warn|ArticleNameHere|header=1}} ~~~~ but header=1 is never even used. I do not know if this was removed for a reason or by accident, or if it just was never added in the first place. I do not know the procedures for editing templates like this so I'll let someone with a bit more expertise do it. If it is supposed to be there, here's the code from the other speedy deletion talk template notices:
{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#ifeq:{{{header}}}|1|=={{{header-text|[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:{{{1}}}]]}}}==}} — Félix Wolf (talk | contribs) 21:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 10 August 2016 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved for consistency with other templates. Hopefully this move doesn't break any scripts. Feel free to revert the move if it does. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Template:Spam-warn-userpage → Template:Db-spamuser-notice – For consistency with other speedy deletion notices (like Template:Db-vandalism-notice, Template:Db-spam-notice, Template:Db-notability-notice, etc). —MRD2014 T C 14:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support for consistency. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 14:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Strong support for consistency. The current title is extremely confusing that it's a CSD tag. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
October 2016 edit
This template lacks anything that addresses the username portions of db-spamuser. In its current state, it's basically the same as db-spam-notice, but with different (possibly better) wording. As the username is just as much a problem as the advertising, I feel the template should be updated to include information about that too.--Yeryry (talk) 12:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)