Template talk:D&D creatures
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Hydrargyrum in topic use of {{Navbox group}}
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
What goes on this template
editI'm thinking that what should go on this template are all pages that list D&D creatures. Each creature by itself doesn't fit. Dragons have list pages, do other creatures? - Peregrine Fisher 21:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- If the creature articles don't all fit in one template, there are probably too many of them and some mergers are needed. We've got all the dragons on one row, and I anticipate eventually doing that with each of the 14 other types. NeonMerlin 04:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
There's no need to expand out all of dragons and all of elementals. There's only a few articles of each, and the dragon(d&d) and elemental(d&d) articles should point to the specialised types anyway --unsigned comment by me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.208.114.181 (talk) 18:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
use of {{Navbox group}}
editDo you know that {{Navbox group}} is only used for adding more groups? Should you wish to have subgroups, {{Navbox generic subgroup}} is what's needed. ChrisDHDR 15:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- {{Navbox group}} and {{Navbox generic subgroup}} now redirect to {{Navbox subgroup}}. — QuicksilverT @ 01:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)