Template talk:Crossrail 2

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Useddenim in topic Revisions

Revisions

edit

This template is now CORRECT. Please Please don't revert the errors back into it calling them "dross".  BRIANTIST  (talk) 14:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If you don't want the trains per hour listed then please explain why they are not needed and remove them alone, the reversion deleted other corrections. As per how we do things here.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 14:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Again, please don't revert the corrections without reason.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 17:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


It seems that User:Useddenim didn't like the use of ↓ to denote a ditto. Replaced with repeated values  BRIANTIST  (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Moved from User talk:Useddenim

Please don't introduce erros into the Crossrail 2 map (Template:Crossrail). Thanks. If you want to remove "dross" please EXPLAIN why it is on the talk page for the template, as per the rules .  BRIANTIST  (talk) 14:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I believe the correct spelling is ‘erroRs’ (unless you meant ‘arrows’); but be specific about what you meant. A simple diff will show what was changed, and—as noted in the edit summary—most of what you added properly belongs in article text. And when you finally figure out how to use BSicons correctly, then maybe you can lecture me about ‘the rules’. Useddenim (talk) 16:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Please talk first and revert later. I've been using BSicons correctly for many years, it seems to me that you're the one in error here! Please don't take out the corrected line order for the top stations and the corrections to the station order on the optional sections. There's actually a whole column in the BSicons template for timings, why are you removing the data?  BRIANTIST  (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Crossrail 2
2015 Consultation Route
"Citizen Space - Crossrail 2 - October 2015". Retrieved 2015-11-22.
 
 
Unless the line extends a significant distance
beyond the station,  
exENDEa is incorrect.
 
 
tph
Trains Per Hour
This properly belongs in the text, not a diagram.
Also, this is not yet finalized: see WP:NOTCRYSTAL.
 
 
10-12
Broxbourne  
The arrows are just plain confusing.
 
 
Cheshunt    
 
 
 
Overground via Seven Sisters
  Why hide the proper name of the link? (Lea Valley Lines)
 
 
Waltham Cross
 
 
 
 
Enfield Lock
 
 
Brimsdown
 
 
Ponders End
 
 
Angel Road (Meridian Water)
 
 
10-12
Northumberland Park
 
 
15
Tottenham Hale    
 
 
 
  Italics are for off-line features.
 
 
Oakleigh Road depot
 
 
  DST is a depot;   HST is a minor station.
 
 
 
10-15
New Southgate  
 
 
 
 
 
 
15
Alexandra Palace  
and
 
 
 
Turnpike Lane  
or
 
 
 
Wood Green  
 
 
 
 
 
 
15
Seven Sisters      
 
 
 
 
 
30
Dalston  
  Your revision named it ‘Easten’.
 
 
future Eastern Branch
 
 
0
Hackney Central  
The icon should be   extINT, not   etKBSTxe.
 
 
 
30
Angel  
 
Euston St. Pancras
 
               
 
 
Tottenham Court Road      
 
Victoria        
 
King's Road Chelsea
 
 
Clapham Junction    
 
 
 
 
Balham     or
 
 
Tooting Broadway  
 
 
 
 
Wier Road depot
Missing   PORTALf tunnel portal.
 
 
 
 
 
30
Wimbledon      
 
 
 
stations below also serve
 
 
Waterloo unless marked ♦
  This note belongs in the article text,
if it is even relevant in the first place.
 
20
Raynes Park  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8-10
Motspur Park  
 
 
 
 
Corner icon is in the wrong row (sloppy, sloppy).
 
 
 
4
Malden Manor
 
 
 
Tolworth
 
 
 
Chessington North
 
 
 
4
Chessington South
 
 
 
4-6
Worcester Park
 
 
 
Stoneleigh
 
 
Ewell West
 
 
4-6
Epsom  
 
10-12
New Malden  
 
 
 
 
 
4
Berrylands
 
 
Surbiton  
 
 
Thames Ditton
 
 
 
4
Hampton Court
 
 
6-8
Norbiton
 
Kingston  
 
Hampton Wick
 
6-8
Teddington  
 
4
Fulwell
 
Hampton
 
Kempton Park
 
Sunbury
 
Upper Halliford
 
4
Shepperton  

Besides the items highlighted in your version of the diagram, to the right, there are the other issues that I have corrected, such as adding {{rws}} and {{rail-interchange}} templates to increase legibility and simplify editing. As far as the track geometry issue (is the West Anglia Main Line to the left or the right of Crosssrail 2?); well, based on the poor quality of your other edits, I decided to revert that to the previous configuration, as well. Useddenim (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I personally prefer the old version by Useddenim, however I think that Briantist's side of the WAML is probably correct (the consultation documents weren't clear about it). But there are a few minor changes needed - most stations, especially south London, need to be HSTs not BHF; the WAML probably should be by CONTr so it doesn't look like it's pointing at the end of the ECML branch, also New Southgate needs the HUB stuff as it will be a single station, and thus also needs ECML arrows. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Briantist: Starting a discussion one place (my talk page) but continuing it elsewhere is (at best) disingenuous, and in poor form. And in neither place did you actually explain what the alleged errors were. Useddenim (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply