Template talk:Chutiya dynasty

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Chaipau in topic Duplicating kings
WikiProject iconIndia: Assam Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Assam.

Purandarnarayan edit

Please give another source for the Dhakuakhana grant. The current sources you have provided are not WP:HISTRS. This is especially problematic because there are a lot of 19th century - 21st century politics riding on these. It is OK to discuss these issues in Chutia kingdom in an NPOV fashion, but it is not OK to insert non-consensus stuff in a template since the template will be used in multiple articles. Chaipau (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Duplicating kings edit

@Homogenie: These identifications are given by Neog (1977). Are you trying to challenge what is given in the historical literature and input your own research results? Chaipau (talk) 00:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Homogenie: read the list given in Neog (1977) page 817:
  1. Nandi
  2. Satyanarayana
  3. Lakshminarayana
  4. Durlabhnarayana
  5. Pratyashanarayana
  6. Yasamanarayana
So please do not insert your own research here and recreate a table not given in the literature.
Chaipau (talk) 01:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Chaipau: ok!

Also Sankhadhwajpal comes from the lineage of Birpal, which historians have rejected as fabricated in the 19th century. Look at the reference to N N Acharya in S Dutta's book and read up the N N Acharya's PhD Theses p225-227. This list has been rejected by Neog, D Nath, Ramesh Burhagohain, Shin and others. Chaipau (talk) 02:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply