This template is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@ZomBear: Until 29 or 30 March, the data for each day appeared to be that announced by the Ministry of Healthcare in their announcement at 10:00 each day - the data announced at 10:00 on 25 March was added to the template as 24 March. But the dates on data have been changed. This will of course justify people in adding unsourced the latest information for each day from where-ever they get it. Verifiability will be lost. Toddy1(talk) 07:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Percentage or absolute option for new infections?edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I started a discussion on that topic here Project COVID-19, Medical cases charts - change type. My personal opinion is that absolute change display suits much better in an epidemic's second wave. But also the status quo ante should be kept until some agreement is reached (locally or possibly a consensus in linked discussion). -- Kohraa Mondel (talk) 15:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply