 | This template was considered for deletion on 2018 July 8. The result of the discussion was "withdrawn". |
 | Council | |||
| ||||
Formatting edit
How about inserting the comments as suggested by the banner meta itself, i.e. as follows:
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> | b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> | b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> | b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> | b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> | b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no>
Comments could also be optional, activated by a template parameter. GregorB (talk) 10:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Good idea. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 00:01, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Notice edit
Template was always substituted and is no longer needed. So replaced with a bolding template. — BrandonALF (talk) (Please ping me) 01:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- To repeat what I said at User talk:BrandonALF:
{{B}}has nothing to do with boldfacing. I've restored the proper template code and documentation. Wikipedia does not have templates as wrappers for basic HTML elements that are re-implemented in'''wikimarkup'''; attempts to create them have repeatedly been deleted at WP:TFD; even{{span}}and{{div}}were deleted. We only have template wrappers for non-wikimarkup elements, and mostly only those used in semantic markup:{{em}},{{strong}},{{code}},{{var}},{{kbd}},{{samp}}. PS: The fact that{{B}}is intended to be substituted is irrelevant. Many templates are, and will even throw an error if you don't do it. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 05:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)