Template:Uw-medrs/testcases

This is the template test cases page for the sandbox of Template:Uw-medrs. Purge this page to update the examples.
If there are many examples of a complicated template, later ones may break due to limits in MediaWiki; see the HTML comment "NewPP limit report" in the rendered page.
You can also use Special:ExpandTemplates to examine the results of template uses.
You can test how this page looks in the different skins and parsers with these links:

1a. No params

{{Uw-medrs}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~

1a. Just a final comment

{{Uw-medrs |comment=Happy editing!}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Happy editing! ~~~~

2. Sourced=no

{{Uw-medrs |sourced=no}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~

3a. Sourced=yes

{{Uw-medrs |sourced=yes}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles where you added a citation to a reliable source. Thank you for respecting Wikipedia's policy on WP:Verifiability and for using citations! In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and the references you added unfortunately did not meet that ideal and may have been removed. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~

3b. Sourced=yes + final comment

{{Uw-medrs |comment=Thanks for working to improve articles on medical topics! |sourced=yes}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles where you added a citation to a reliable source. Thank you for respecting Wikipedia's policy on WP:Verifiability and for using citations! In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and the references you added unfortunately did not meet that ideal and may have been removed. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Thanks for working to improve articles on medical topics! ~~~~

4a. One positional param

{{Uw-medrs|Vulcan anesthesiology}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles such as Vulcan anesthesiology without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~

4b. Two positional params

{{Uw-medrs|Vulcan anesthesiology|Invertebrates on Ganymede}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to several articles such as Vulcan anesthesiology and Invertebrates on Ganymede without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~

5a. One 'good' article

{{Uw-medrs |good1=Robot plankton}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. On the other hand, the sourcing for Robot plankton looks fine, keep up the good work! Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~

5b. Two 'good' articles

{{Uw-medrs |good1=Robot plankton |good2=Jovian exophyla}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. On the other hand, the sourcing for Robot plankton and Jovian exophyla looks fine, keep up the good work! Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~

5c. Two 'good' articles. two positionals

{{Uw-medrs|Vulcan anesthesiology|Invertebrates on Ganymede |good1=Robot plankton |good2=Jovian exophyla}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to several articles such as Vulcan anesthesiology and Invertebrates on Ganymede without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. On the other hand, the sourcing for Robot plankton and Jovian exophyla looks fine, keep up the good work! Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~

5d. Two 'good' articles. two positionals (reversed args)

{{Uw-medrs|Vulcan anesthesiology|Invertebrates on Ganymede |good1=Robot plankton |good2=Jovian exophyla}}

Hi Uw-medrs, I'm Andrybak. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to several articles such as Vulcan anesthesiology and Invertebrates on Ganymede without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. On the other hand, the sourcing for Robot plankton and Jovian exophyla looks fine, keep up the good work! Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. ~~~~