Template:Disputed list/doc

This is a documentation subpage for Template:Disputed list.
It may contain usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page.

Meaning edit

This template identifies a Wikipedia list that has content whose truth, factual nature, or relevance to the topic is in dispute.

Usage edit

To apply this template to an article, first add a new section "Disputed Inclusion" to the talk page, describing the problems with the disputed statements. Add {{Disputed-list}} to the top of the disputed article. To include a link to the section of the talk page discussing the dispute, use {{Disputed-list|talk page section name}}. If the talk page section name is "Disputed Inclusion" (as standard), then the tag should be {{Disputed-list}}, and if the section name is f.ex. "Disputed Inclusion", the tag should be {{Disputed-list|Disputed Inclusion}}.

If there is no talk page, the tag won't refer to it, and it's recommended to consider (when there is no reason to tag it) whether the tag should be there.

This template will place the article into Category:Accuracy disputes.

This template is a self-reference.
Please do not subst: this template.

v t e Citation and verifiability article maintenance templates
Sourcing	{{Circular}} {{Dubious}} {{Excessive citations}} {{Further reading cleanup}} {{More citations needed}} {{More citations needed section}} {{More footnotes needed}} {{No footnotes}} {{No significant coverage}} {{One source}} {{One source section}} {{Only primary sources}} {{NRIS only}} {{Primary sources}} {{Primary sources section}} {{Religious text primary}} {{Self-published}} {{Self-reference cleanup}} {{Self-sourcing examples}} {{Refexample section}} {{Sources exist}} {{Text-source}} {{Third-party}} {{Unreferenced}} {{Unreferenced section}} {{Unreferenced category}} {{Unreliable sources}} {{Unreliable sources section}} {{User-generated}}
BLP-specific	{{BLP unreferenced}} {{BLP unreferenced section}} {{BLP primary sources}} {{BLP self-published}} {{BLP sources}} {{BLP sources section}} {{BLP IMDb-only refimprove}} {{BLP IMDb refimprove}} {{BLP no footnotes}} {{BLP more footnotes needed}} {{BLP one source}}
Topic specific	{{Localist}} {{Media IMDb refimprove}} {{More medical citations needed}} {{More science citations needed}} {{Neologism}} {{Science review}} {{Unreferenced law}} {{Unreferenced-law section}} {{Unreferenced medical section}}
Dispute-related	{{Cite check}} {{Cite check section}} {{Content}} {{Disputed}} {{Dispute about}} {{Disputed section}} {{Disputed chem}} {{Disputed list}} {{Disputed map}} {{Expert needed}} {{Hoax}} {{Original research}} {{Original research section}} {{Speculation}} {{Speculation section}} {{Synthesis}} {{Verifiability}} {{Verify sources}}
Citation improvements	{{Citation style}} {{Citations broken}} {{Cleanup bare URLs}} {{Format footnotes}} {{Full citations needed}} {{Ibid}} {{Page numbers improve}} {{Page numbers needed}} {{Shallow references}}
General advice	Citing sources Reliable sources Maintenance template removal Citation needed Find sources Combining sources Referencing styles

Template:Disputed list/doc

Contents

Meaning edit

Usage edit

See also edit

Wikipedia project pages edit

Templates edit

Disputed factual accuracy edit

Both accuracy and POV edit

Disputed neutrality (POV) edit

Wiki edit