Template:Did you know nominations/You Go to My Head (film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 05:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
You Go to My Head (film)
- ... that the 2017 romantic-thriller You Go to My Head does not use any artificial lighting? Source: https://closeupculture.com/2018/12/12/interview-you-go-to-my-head-director-dimitri-de-clercq-on-being-inspired-by-delfine-bafort-and-the-sahara/ "Not a single artificial light was used in the making of the movie"
- Reviewed: Alexander Hamilton (book)
Created by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 18:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC).
- The article is new enough, having been created on 8 April but is in the wrong place (9 April). It's long enough at 1007 words of readable prose, conforms to WP's policies and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing but the inclusion of several quotes bumps up the copyvio score.[[1]] The hook is correctly formatted, broadly interesting and is cited in the article.--Ykraps (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ykraps, I have trimmed the quotes. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi CAPTAIN MEDUSA. The quotes are okay. What I am questioning is, is there any reason you've posted the nom in the 9 April section, when the article was created on 8 April? The rules are, the nom should be posted in "...subsection for the date on which the article was created or on which expansion began (or, if a new Good Article, the date on which it became a GA), not the date on which you make the nomination". This may not be a big deal, and indeed it might cause more problems to move it, but I wanted to know if you had a reason for doing it, before seeking the advice of a co-ordinator.--Ykraps (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ykraps, I used a script called DYK-helper to nominate this article for DYK. I forgot to change the date. The script gets today’s date rather than when the article was created. Hopefully this answers your question. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi CAPTAIN MEDUSA. The quotes are okay. What I am questioning is, is there any reason you've posted the nom in the 9 April section, when the article was created on 8 April? The rules are, the nom should be posted in "...subsection for the date on which the article was created or on which expansion began (or, if a new Good Article, the date on which it became a GA), not the date on which you make the nomination". This may not be a big deal, and indeed it might cause more problems to move it, but I wanted to know if you had a reason for doing it, before seeking the advice of a co-ordinator.--Ykraps (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset As someone who appears to be particularly active in this arena, does this nomination need to be moved? --Ykraps (talk) 05:05, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ykraps, the fact that the nomination has been placed under the wrong date shouldn't affect the review one way or the other, and should not delay approval. The placement seems to be one of the more complicated steps in the nomination process, because a fair number of people get it wrong; as you know, it should be placed under the creation/move to mainspace/first expansion edit/GA approval date, based on UTC time. Some people don't remember the UTC part, some do creation date rather than move-to-mainspace date for articles that started in sandboxes or draftspace, etc. Being placed under a later date would probably have delayed promotion by a day or two, so I've moved the transclusion to the proper date. People using DYK-helper don't do the transclusion themselves; it's taken care of by the app, but to the date they've specified, as happened here—the wrong date was entered into the app. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)