Template:Did you know nominations/Xylomelum pyriforme

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)
yes

Xylomelum pyriforme edit

(edit nomination page)

Xylomelum pyriforme

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 03:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Date, length, sourcing all check out fine. No plagiarism/close paraphrasing that I can find. Image is appropriate and article is clear and well-written. A couple of things though: I'm not sure I really understand the hook, which says that X. pyriforme "resembles" a woody pear. The article doesn't actually say this; it says that it's "commonly known as the woody pear". Could you please clarify this? Also, it would be helpful if we could have a source for the translation of the Latin name at the end of the first para. Prioryman (talk) 07:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
  • There is a mention of the hook towards the end of the article. The hook is dull though ("Fruit looks like fruit") and would need imperial conversion added. The image is a little indistinct as a thumbnail and isn't used in the article itself. Yomanganitalk 09:13, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
  • I have a couple of suggestions for alternative hooks based on material I've just added to the article:
ALT1: ... that Xylomelum pyriforme is one of a number of Australian species that require fire to open and disperse their seeds?
ALT2: ... that early European settlers of Australia used the wood of Xylomelum pyriforme to make gun stocks?
  • Either seem to me more "hooky" than the original proposal. Any thoughts? By the way, I see that a source has been added for the Latin name, so that issue is now resolved. Prioryman (talk) 12:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
ALT2 I like, ALT1 is fairly generic. Yes it is frustrating finding a good photo. These plants are not uncommon around Sydney but someone keeps stealing all the goddam seed pods :/ I will double check my old photos again....Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
I'm happy to sign off the nomination now, but do you want me to keep it open for a few days while you try to find a picture? Prioryman (talk) 13:52, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Naw, just spend a couple of hours rummaging round my hard drives and checking flickr. Can't be bothered, but I did find photos of Xylomelum occidentale, so I might expand that instead and come up with some other hook...or maybe not. Casliber (talk · contribs) 15:01, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Fair enough. In that case it's good to go with ALT2 preferred. I don't think the image is too bad, actually, so I wouldn't sweat it. Prioryman (talk) 18:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
NB: I reviewed: Thlaspi californicum