Template:Did you know nominations/Witch Fire

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 15:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Witch Fire

Improved to Good Article status by The4lines (talk). Self-nominated at 19:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Witch Fire; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • @The4lines: Article was recently promoted to GA status, so it is eligible. QPQ is not needed. I feel as if you're trying to put a bit too much information into the ALT0. Are you able to remove some information a bit? Maybe it just needs the high evacuation numbers or other statistics? Panamitsu (talk) 02:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
@Panamitsu: Maybe something like this? The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 15:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
I formatted ALT0a, but I will tweak the hook a bit.
Also note: Earwig is not working for me. Bruxton (talk) 15:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC)