Template:Did you know nominations/Wilberforce (cat)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Evrik (talk) 06:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Wilberforce (cat)

Improved to Good Article status by Tim O'Doherty (talk). Self-nominated at 22:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Wilberforce (cat); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: @Tim O'Doherty: Good article. But, i feel as if these hooks aren't all too interesting. Is there something better that could be done? Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

@Onegreatjoke I thought they were all interesting. How about a modification of the first one "... that the Lincolnshire Echo wrote that Wilberforce "seem[ed] to go on forever"?" Best, Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
I guess when thinking about it they're a little interesting. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)