Template:Did you know nominations/Washington Monument

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Washington Monument edit

Improved to Good Article status by Kai Tak (talk). Nominated by Royroydeb (talk) at 07:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Promoted to GA on day of nom, long enough, well written. No requirement for QPQ as neither creator or nom have previous DYK credit. I just find the hook to be very dull. I suggest:
  • ALT1 ... that standing at over 169 metres (554 ft), the Washington Monument is both the world's tallest stone structure and the world's tallest obelisk?
Kai Tak and Royroydeb, are you ok with this? Oncenawhile (talk) 22:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @Oncenawhile: per Rule H2, you cannot approve your own hook. I changed your green tick to a question-mark. After you sort out ALT1 with the page creator and nominator, please call for another reviewer to complete this nomination. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
I have no problem Oncenawhile. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 08:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  • - I'd do something about how a crack in the monument led to it being shut down for over a year. That could be very interesting. Sportsguy17 (TC) 16:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  • ALT2 ... that the Washington Monument was closed for 32 months due to a crack found near the top of the structure?
Proposed ALT2 above. Sportsguy17 (TC) 20:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
32 months stat checks out. Good to go. Oncenawhile (talk) 21:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @Sportsguy17: thanks for pitching in. But the monument was closed due to much more than one crack, according to the article. Yoninah (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Another proposed, more accurate. Sportsguy17 (TC) 21:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The ALT 4 looks the best. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:49, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Since I can't approve my own hook, could another reviewer sign off on this? Yoninah (talk) 09:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  • for ALT4. Hook is cited, meets core content policies, and meets eligibility criterion, so all is good to go. Sportsguy17 (TC) 11:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)