The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 13:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Concerns have been raised about the promotion to GA status, and the promotion has been voided for now. No prejudice against renomination if/when GA status has been properly attained.

Waluigi

Improved to Good Article status by Fieryninja (talk). Self-nominated at 21:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Waluigi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Fieryninja: Promoted to GA on 2/5, and spot checking sources shows no issues. That being said, the GA review is improper (The lead is a bit short, broadness isn't met) This appears to have been a rubber stamped review and a discussion on User talk:Begocc and Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations shows that the GA status is likely to be revoked since it was done improperly.

At this time, the GA reviewer has requested that the review by voided and added back to the queue. This disqualifies this DYK since it no longer meets eligibility requirements. Once this is properly elevated to GA status, then it can be renominated for DYK. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 01:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)