- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:42, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
WGBO-DT
Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 18:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Hmm, I do not think I could pass this up. An article recently promoted to GA and is long enough as it's greater than the 1,500 characters in the prose. Everything is properly sourced, neutral in tone, and free from copyright or close paraphrasing. Earwig only picks up quotes or common words or phrases. Both hooks are very interesting. Although, I like ALT 1 a bit more for its hooky-ness. Both hooks are cited. In any event, this article was a pleasant read for the morning. QPQ is completed.
If there is any feedback I could give, I would change citation [49; The New York Times] title's capitalization per Help:Citation Style 1#Titles and chapters and citations [64; RabbitEars] and [65; RabbitEars] website parameters from "www.rabbitears.info" to "RabbitEars". All around well done! Adog (Talk・Cont) 14:57, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- The RabbitEars fix I was pointed to at FAC for WBPX-TV, and new refs of that type have that fixed. NYT metadata...can be a bit hard with capitalization. Thanks so much. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Hmm, I do not think I could pass this up. An article recently promoted to GA and is long enough as it's greater than the 1,500 characters in the prose. Everything is properly sourced, neutral in tone, and free from copyright or close paraphrasing. Earwig only picks up quotes or common words or phrases. Both hooks are very interesting. Although, I like ALT 1 a bit more for its hooky-ness. Both hooks are cited. In any event, this article was a pleasant read for the morning. QPQ is completed.