Template:Did you know nominations/Vulgate manuscripts

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 11:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Currently ineligible for DYK

Vulgate manuscripts

A page from the Codex Amiatinus.
A page from the Codex Amiatinus.
  • ... that the oldest manuscript of the Vulgate, a 4th-century translation of the Bible in Latin, is the Codex Amiatinus which dates from the very beginning of the 8th century? Source: "Codex Amiatinus is the earliest complete Latin Bible. It is one of three giant, single-volume Bibles, made at Wearmouth-Jarrow in the early years of the 8th century. [...] Created: Before 716" ([1])
    • ALT1:

Created by Veverve (talk). Self-nominated at 10:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC).

  • Essentially consists (per the edit history) of two large chunks from pre-existing articles (one a list). May well be a good idea, but doesn't seem to meet the DYK criteria, as the stuff copied over in the first edit hasn't been expanded 5 times. Most new material seems to be list formatting & refs. Johnbod (talk) 19:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)