- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:31, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Not eligible due to lack of a hook and no expansion; closing as unsuccessful
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Vocabulary
- ... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created/expanded by Hillhs20 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC).
Sorry, Hillhs20, but it's not eligible. It looks like all of your edits to the article have been reverted. Even if they weren't, the required five times expansion isn't really possible, as the article is currently at 12674 prose characters. Also, no hook was included, and the nomination hasn't been transcluded. If you get the article to good article status, you may resubmit within a week of that designation. See WP:DYK for general information. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 22:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
