Template:Did you know nominations/Urbanization in the German Empire
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Urbanization in the German Empire edit
- ... that several German cities had their populations increase five-fold or more between 1875 and 1910? (Source: http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=644 )
Created/expanded by Futurist110 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC).
- I have now reviewed this DYK? nomination: Template:Did you know nominations/M-K TE70-4S Futurist110 (talk) 00:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
New enough, long enough, neutral. Earwig picks up nothing. The "several" in the hook have to be worked out by the reviewer from the statistics in the source which is not good enough. Please at least add to the text or ref note in the article. Johnbod (talk) 03:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- How exactly should I add additional statistics to this article? Basically, I want to clarify this part. Futurist110 (talk) 06:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Don't just say "several cities" - say which. There's only a few in the source. Or at least give examples. Johnbod (talk) 12:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- ALT HOOK 1: ... that the German cities of Duisburg, Essen, and Kiel all had their populations increase five-fold or more between 1875 and 1910? (Source: http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=644 )
- Don't just say "several cities" - say which. There's only a few in the source. Or at least give examples. Johnbod (talk) 12:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- How exactly should I add additional statistics to this article? Basically, I want to clarify this part. Futurist110 (talk) 06:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- There--is this good enough? Also, I have already fixed this in the article as well. Futurist110 (talk) 22:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
