Template:Did you know nominations/United States v. Hatter

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 15:36, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

United States v. Hatter

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the United States Supreme Court upheld a requirement that federal judges have to pay taxes for Medicare in United States v. Hatter?

• Reviewed: 2012 ABL Regular Season

Created/expanded by Lord Roem (talk). Self nom at 04:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

• New, long enough and adequately cited.--DavidCane (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)